Prince Harry and Meghan Markle are being debated as not eligible for security protection as they are now considered mere celebrities. Despite being targeted by a stalker during recent incidents in London, where the individual came dangerously close to Prince Harry, the argument stands that they should not receive taxpayer-funded security. Jane Moore, a columnist and regular on Loose Women, emphasized that as Harry is no longer a working royal, the executive committee Ravec decided he no longer qualifies for state-backed protection. Moore pointed out that with their transition to celebrity status and numerous commercial deals, Harry and Meghan may no longer warrant such security measures.
The couple, who announced their decision to step back as working members of the royal family in January 2020, were initially offered a customized security service requiring advanced notice for UK visits. However, Jane Moore contended that considering Harry and Meghan as mere celebrities, they should not receive state-backed security when other public figures facing similar threats do not benefit from such protections.
The discussion also referenced stalking incidents involving well-known personalities like Shirley Ballas and Myleene Klass, highlighting the challenges faced by celebrities without state-provided security.