Political commentator Paul Routledge, a renowned figure from Fleet Street, joined the Mirror in 1998. Throughout history, right-wing politicians have often resorted to exploiting concerns about migrants for political gain.
Currently, Nigel Farage is capitalizing on public apprehension about boat migrants, which is a recurring theme in right-wing politics. In the past, attitudes towards migration have fluctuated. Initially, post-World War II, migration from Commonwealth nations like India and the Caribbean was welcomed due to labor shortages, notably in the NHS.
However, as migrant numbers increased, so did resentment, leading to racially-motivated violence in various UK regions. Discrimination, such as “no Irish, no blacks” policies, was prevalent, culminating in the Commonwealth Immigration Act of 1962, which restricted the automatic right to settle in the UK.
In response to rising tensions, the Race Relations Act of 1965 aimed to combat racial hatred, although further legislation was needed to address discrimination fully. Enoch Powell’s controversial “Rivers of Blood” speech in 1968 intensified anti-immigrant sentiments, sparking public support and influencing political discourse.
Over the years, right-wing politicians, including Margaret Thatcher and Nigel Farage, have echoed Powell’s views on immigration, perpetuating divisive rhetoric. Boris Johnson’s Brexit campaign capitalized on anti-migrant sentiments, echoing past strategies of exploiting public fears for political gain.
The enduring legacy of divisive immigration rhetoric underscores the importance of politicians reflecting on the impact of their words in a polarized society. Upholding principles of decency and humanity should guide political discourse in addressing complex immigration issues.